Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Antimycobacterial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of nine plants against Mycobacterium bacteria

Alveera Singh1, Katharigatta N Venugopala1,2 , Melendran Pillay3, Francis Shode1, Yacoob Coovadia2, Bharti Odhav1

1Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa; 2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Microbiology, NHLS, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital, South Africa.

For correspondence:-    

Published: 30 April 2021

Citation: Singh A, Venugopala KN, Pillay M, Shode F, Coovadia Y, Odhav B. Antimycobacterial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of nine plants against Mycobacterium bacteria. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(4):849-858 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i4.27

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was done to evaluate the antimycobacterial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of nine plants viz., Buddleja saligna, Carpobrotus dimidiatus, Capparis tomentosa, Dichrostachys cinerea, Ekebergia capensis, Ficus sur, Gunnera perpensa, Leonotis leonurus and Tetradenia riparia in South Africa. 
Methods: Aqueous and methanol extracts of the leaves the plants were tested in vitro for their activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 25177) and three well-characterized clinical isolates of MDR and XDR-TB isolates using the agar incorporation method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each of the active plant extract was determined using the broth microdilution method. Cytotoxic effect was evaluated against the mouse BALB/C monocyte macrophage (J774.2) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) whole the toxicity screening was done using the brine shrimp lethality assay. Composition of each of the plants was determined using thin layer chromatography while qualitative analysis of antimycobacterial compounds was done using TLC-Bioautography
Results: The methanol extracts of B. saligna, C. tormentosa and C. dimidiatus; and aqueous extracts of G. perpensa and T. riparia possessed significant activity against M. smegmatis, M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 25177) and the three well-characterized clinical isolates of MDR and XDR-TB.  Except for a high concentration of G. perpensa none of the other plants which possessed antimycobacterial activity showed any toxic or cytotoxic activity.
Conclusion: Our findings show that B. saligna, C. tormentosa, C. dimidiatus, G. perpensa, and T. riparia have antimycobacterial activity. Further studies would aim at isolation and identification of the active compounds from the plants extracts which had positive antimycobacterial activity.

Keywords: Anti-TB activity, extraction, Safety Evaluation, MDR-strains, XDR-strains

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates